|
A territory-wide survey conducted by
the Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups found that young people had great
expectation for education policy of the SAR Government and the Secretary for
Education and Manpower. 40% of
respondents respectively hoped that the Government would give priority to
unemployment problem and education in the coming year.
In respondents' heart, a sympathetic ear and understanding of
the plight of citizens, responsibility and ability to handle tasks assigned,
as well as deep integrity were considered to be the most important criteria
in being a good Secretary.
Of the 520 young respondents, 259 (50%) expressed an interest to be any
one of the Secretaries if given the chance.
The Secretary for Education and Manpower was the most popular
Secretary to whom respondents most wished to be, followed by the Secretary
for Environment and Food. The
Secretary for Security and the Secretary for Economic Services ranked third
and fourth. Of those who
expressed an interest to be any of the Secretaries, around 30% attributed the reason for their choice in a
particular Secretary to a "discontent
of existing policy",
followed by the great influence and importance they believed that particular
secretary had reserved
Although more than half of the respondents said that
they did not want to meet any Policy Secretary, some 12.4% would like to
meet the Secretary for Education and Manpower, with 4% of respondents
wanting to meet the Secretary for Housing and the Secretary for Economic
Services. The Secretary for Education was also ranked as having the
greatest influence in Government, followed by the Secretary for Security and
The Secretary for Economic Services. 12%
of respondents were of the view that all the Secretaries enjoyed great
influence.
Issues related to unemployment, education, and environmental
protection were three areas to which respondents expected the Government to
give priority in the coming year. Issues
related to economic revitalization and the supply of housing ranked fourth
and fifth.
With regard to education policy, the areas to which the Government should
pay attention were to upgrade the quality of teachers, reform educational
structure and examination system. With
regard to improving unemployment, more than 40% of respondents believed that
the Government should give priority in stimulating the economy.
The proportion of respondents looking for more pre-employment
training, learning and skill-developed training courses were also
significant. The findings
highlight that young people had a great expectation that the education
policy would upgrade
one's competitiveness.
With
regard to the environmental protection policy, the areas to which the
Government should pay attention were improving the air quality, increasing
the awareness of environmental protection, and improving the water
quality and reducing rubbish or refuse materials.
With regard to housing policy, the areas in which the Government
should give priority were to monitor the quality of housing, provide more
housing units, and stabilize property prices, as well as shorten the waiting
periods for public rental units.
The telephone poll, conducted by the Hong Kong Federation of Youth
Groups from 18 to 23 September, successfully interviewed 520 young people
aged between 15 and 29. Around 60% of respondents issued 50 points or above on a
scale of 0-100 to the performance of the Chief Executive on upgrading the
competitiveness of local people, as well as in improving the quality life
for local citizens over the past year.
Yet, on average the Chief Executive scored 48 points only regarding
his performance on the two areas, a figure 2-points below the pass. Older respondents were more critical than their younger
counterparts in evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive on
upgrading the competitiveness of local people.
The
Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups has been conducting surveys on youth's views regarding Government's
policy since the establishment of the SAR Government. The Federation will submit the results of this survey to the
relevant Policy Bureau for reference.
End